Letter from Dr. Dienstag about Article on the Fifth Amendment and Halacha (1955)

View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

Letter from R. Isaac Klein about Article on the Fifth Amendment and Halacha (1956)

Dear Rabbi Lamm: Let me congratulate you upon your fine study published in the last issue of Judaism. I am happy to learn that the day by day duties of the rabbinate have not completely displaced your inclination to study. Keep it up. Very few rabbis manage to pay proper attention to both. May I also use this opportunity to thank you for your telegram congratulating me at the occasion of my receiving life tenure. It was very thoughtful of you and I appreciate it very much. Regards to your charming rebbitzen and to your entire flock. Rabbi Isaac Klein

Jewish Law & Secular Law

Letter from Dean Griswold about Article on the Fifth Amendment and Halacha (1956)

Dear Rabbi Lamm, Thank you very much for your letter of March 7th. I am glad to know about your article on the principle of self-incrimination, and I greatly appreciate your kindness in sending me a copy. This is an area in which I have wanted light, and I am sure that you will provide it for me. Very truly yours, Erwin N. Griswold, Dean

Jewish Law & Secular Law

Letter from David Greenbaum about Article on the Fifth Amendment and Halacha (1956)

Dear Norman: I read your article ”The Fifth Amendment And Its Equivalent In The Halakhah”, appearing in the recent issue of ”Judaism”. I not only read the article but re-read it. I tell you in all sincerity, without embellishments and exaggeration, that the article is brilliant and shows that you are not only a remarkable student, but also possess a keen incisive mind. Your article was not only very interesting, but very timely. I need not tell you that the problems of the Fifth Amendment are now before the Courts and will be with us for a long time to come. Only yesterday, our Apellate Division of the Supreme Court, Second Department, handed down a decision with respect to confessions. The decision referred to Section 395 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of New York which, insofar as it was pertinent to the case under review, reads as follows:”A confession of a defendant whether in the course of judicial proceedings or to a private person, can be given in evidence against him <hh> but is not sufficient to warrant his con-fession without additional proof that the crime charged has been committed.”You will observe the safeguard which the Legislature es-tablished to prevent the very things you mention in your article. The confessions referred to are voluntary con-fessions because forced confessions are thrown out and not considered by the Courts. Your article, too, disregards forced confessions. In all my years of reading law, I have neveT’ come upon a more lucid exposition of reasons fb r dis-regarding statements of self-incrimination.I congratulate you on your splendid efforts. I extend to you, Mindella and the baby my best wishes for a Hanny pesach.Sincerely,

Jewish Law & Secular Law