5 results
Sort by: Oldest first
Newest first
Oldest first

Six-Day War

Correspondence

Letter from R. Peli about the Six-Day War (1967)

ידידי היקר הרב ר' נחום הי"ו, ברוך הגומל לחייבים טובות שגמלנו כל טוב שהחיינו וקיימנו והגיענו לזמן הזה. לא קלים היו הימים הגדולים שעברו עלינו אבל – הודו לה' כי טוב כי לעולם חסדו ועכשיו זכינו וראינו בישועתו. מאת ה' היתה זאת היא נפלאת בעינינו. ועוד נדבר ועוד נספר על כל הניסים והנפלאות אשר ראו עינינו במהלכי הגאולה, הנה זה עומד אמר כתלנו. התחילו להתכונן! בין אם "היוניון" כשר החליט על-כך, או R.C.A. מאשר זאת, ישנה הרגשה שמשיח צדקנו מתקרב ובא. בכל פינה כאן שומעים פעמו המשיח ואשר המחכה וגו'.

Correspondence

Letter to R. Karasick about Proposal from L. Carmell (1967)

Dear Joe: You recently received a rather long letter from a Mr. L. Carmell in London about trying to exploit the current hitorerut in a positive manner. I have never met him, but he certainly seems to be an active, efficient, and scholarly individual. I just received, this week, a complaint that his communications to you, to Dr. Weiss, and to Rabbi Kotler, have gone unanswered. It might be a good idea to reread his proposal and at least keep in contact with him. Best wishes for a happy year for all. Cordially yours, Rabbi Norman Lamm.

Article

The Religious Meaning of the Six-Day War (1968)

I am convinced that any attempt to explain the events in June 1967 as no more than a remarkable coincidence of natural factors reveals, on the part of the non-believer, an extraordinary act of naive faith in the dogmas of agnosticism, and, on the part of the believer, a defense-mechanism by which to protect himself against possible future disappointment. The Six Day War was certainly a case of “revelation.” But even more than a revelation of divine power and direction of history, it was a revelation in the sense that the author of the Tanya (R. Shneur Zalman Miladi) uses the term: a revealing to man’s consciousness of the unsuspected reservoir of religious faith within him (“The hidden and natural love”). The sense of elation was universal amongst Jews, and it was authentically religious rather than nationalistic. It was the return to Mt. Moriah, notthe capture of Mt. Scopus, that aroused this unparalleled exaltation. And, the existence of this inner Jewish religiousness, for whatever the reason, was not “revealed” to this extent before— neither in 1948 nor in 1956.In attempting to understand these events in theological terms, I would rather not speak the language of messianism and redemption. Overloaded with centuries of sentiment, and so abused by repetition these past twenty years, terms such as at'chalta di’geulah (beginning of the Redemption) and ikvata de’-mashichah (Messianic Era) inspire but do not clarify.I prefer to analyze our situation in terms of the Biblical concept of hester panim (“the hiding of the face,” i.e., God’s withdrawal from a direct relationship with Israel). This is a concept which has been insufficiently explored but has immediate relevance to contemporary Jewish history. The need for brevity forces me to condense my remarks, perhaps beyond the limits of comprehensibility, and to eliminate mention of my sources. Nevertheless, I consider it a more fruitful approach than the language of Messianism.The Torah considers hester na-nim the ulti…

Correspondence

Letter to R. Karasick about Addressing the Vietnam War from the Pulpit (1968)

Dear Joe: I feel it only right that you be informed in advance of a position I shortly expect to embrace publicly. As Directors of the UOJCA, we are bound by the pro-Administration policy on Vietnam, as voted at our last national convention. Since that time, a great deal has happened to make me feel that I am not only out of sympathy with our official position, but that I am impelled by conscience to speak out against it. Moreover, I am deeply distressed by the raucous hawkishness of certain Orthodox organizations who have left the impression that a pro-Johnson position on Vietnam is another test of one's loyalty to Torah. I always was disdainful of those Reform and Conservative men who identified an anti-Vietnam policy with "Judaism," and I feel no less impatient with the primitive anti-Communism of certain Orthodox organizations that do just the reverse. I once believed that Vietnam was a political-military issue of such technical nature that we ordinary citizens could not hope to gather sufficient significant information to pass judgment intelligently on it. But obviously, Vietnam has now become the central moral issue of our times. One need not raise an anti-Johnson position on Vietnam to the level of a religious dogma in order to feel that the lives of all Americans are profoundly affected by the issue of Vietnam, and that this whole dirty mess is sucking all of us into it inexorably and irrevocably.The argument that a dovish statement by Jews on Vietnam will harm Israel’s case in Administration circles is unconvincing• If, during last June’s war, Israel would have needed military intervention by the U. S., it could not have received it because of American over-coamit-t»ent in Asia•For Orthodox leadership opposed to escalation in Vietnam to continue their silence is wrong on two counts. First, considering the dimensions of the problem, it is morally incumbent upon us to speak out without, at the same time, arrogating to our Vietnam position the authority of Ju…

Correspondence

Exchange with Monroe Levie about Request for Copies of Six-Day War Sermons (1968)

Dear Rabbi Lamm, I am presently writing a Master’s Thesis for the Department of Speech of the University of Minnesota. The subject of my thesis concerns a rhetorical analysis of rabbinic sermons which dealt with the Middle East crisis of 1967. These sermons may have been delivered before, during or after the crisis. I am writing to you upon the recommendation of Rabbi Jerome Herzog of Knesseth Israel Synagogue, Minneapolis, Minnesota, in the sincere hope that you may be able to provide transcripts of any sermons you may have delivered before your congregation concerning the Israeli crisis. If you have transcripts which you could send to me, I would appreciate if you could indicate the date of delivery, the approximate number of people who heard the sermon, and the occasion during which the sermon was delivered (Friday evening service, Saturday morning service, etc.).My department feels this is a unique study which has not been previously attempted, and any assistance you may be able to provide regarding transcripts of your sermons will be greatly appreciated.Sincerely,Monroe Levie 21116 Rhode Island Minneapolis, Minnesota ^^26