Dear Arnold: Please accept my thanks and appreciation for sending me the November, 1964 issue of ״Minnesota Law Review,״ which contains your superb article on ״Counsel for the Suspect.״ Your reference to my ״Judaism״ article explains to me how Warren obtained knowledge of my essay. Hence, my thanks to you for my brief excursion into delicious eminence. I did not know your address in Washington, and hence this letter bs being sent to your Minneapolis address.My very fondest regards to your wife, and my sincerely meant invitation to call me whenever you are in New York so that we can get together for a "schmus.״ Good luck.Cordially yours,Rabbi Norman LammNL/le

Dear Norm: Thanks for the reprints. They were particularly welcome since I missed both articles because of our stay in Israel. Had I seen the one on the 4th Amendment earlier, I would have worked it into an article I am publishing in the Israel Law Review dealing with electronic eavesdropping. The distinction between aural eavesdropping which can be protected against and other forms of eavesdropping which know no protection seems to me vital. I'll send you a reprint. My best to Mindi. Sincerely, Arnold Enker.