My dear Lamm, I knew I would not have to appeal to you in vain, though the result is not entirely satisfactory. At the same time as writing to you, I also sent a separate appeal to Wurzburger. He replied with a letter full of apologies and said he had instructed them to send me both the journal and a check for the article (which I had not even mentioned). This week a copy of the journal arrived by air mail without any accompanying letter of explanation, reference to my request for offprints, or check. I still therefore do not know where I stand with regard to the offprints. If I was absolutely sure that I am not getting them, I would involve myself in the not inconsiderable expense of having it reproduced here, but naturally I do not want to involve myself in this expenditure if it can be avoided. Could you please ascertain if there is any chance of my getting them?By a peculiar coincidence, on the same day as I received your letter wishing me "good luck" with regard to England, there appeared No. 338 of *Panim el Panim* (22/10/65) and in the "gossip column" "al tufta im" appeared an item to the effort of the United Synagogue have decided to offer you the position. It ties up with a statement in *Haboker* from their London correspondent that they will definitely turn to the U.S.A. I know that this can only be kite-flying since the first meeting, at which only preliminary steps will be taken, takes place only tomorrow.Nevertheless I want to express my considered opinion to you that you would be an ideal choice, and that should the approach be made to you, to give it your favourable consideration.I want to be quite frank with you, on the basis of the very real and valued friendship and esteem which exists between us. I regard my chances to London as minimal. Wolfson has been here for a fortnight and returns today despite the fact that he was pressed to contact me by my friends before he left England. He has made no effort whatsoever to contact me.When the news of He…