Home Home / Letter to Hans Bachrach about the Hashk…

Correspondence

Nov. 29, 1973

Letter to Hans Bachrach about the Hashkafic Makeup of the Counterpoint Australia Seminar (1973)

Australia & New Zealand
View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

RELATED CONTENT

Correspondence

Letter to Hans Bachrach about Educational Material and Kashrut for Counterpoint Australia Seminar (1973)

Dear Hans, I am writing to you again, after perusing some of your previous letters which I have not yet answered. Forgive me for the piece-meal nature of this response, but I hope that after this letter is concluded I will essentially be up-to-date in our correspondence. I doubt very much if Rabbi Riskin will be able to get away for a whole summer (your winter) to Australia. I have, however, spoken to a number of individuals, and I believe that it will not be too difficult to compose a good staff for the Rabbinic Department.With regard to the coordinator, I believe Dr. Stern has already written to you and indicated the need for some kind of subvention. I do not believe that the material delivered to you by Arnold Roth was meant to be duplicated for use in Australia in toto. Naturally, it will have to be revised for local consumption.The same is true with regard to the question of Hebrew. All these things can be worked out once you have formalized your arrangements with Dr. Stern.With regard to the question concerning Kashrut, we generally accept the §M\$ténsignia. There are a number of items which are accepted on their own merit. Interestingly, Manischewitz enjoys a good reputation for all its products with the sole exception of its wine.Once again, all my very best wishes and warmest regards.Cordially yours,RABBI NORMAN LAMM
Australia & New Zealand

Correspondence

Letter from Hans Bachrach to Abraham Stern about Counterpoint Australia Programming (1974)

Dear Hillel, My first name is Hans or Abraham, and I guess we will be seeing each other soon. May I take the liberty of addressing you by your first name, and I hope you will do likewise. It was a particular pleasure to receive your handwritten letter from Chicago, where I hope you enjoyed being with your family. Your writing is clear and I hasten to answer your letter. The intensity of the seminars had been previously communicated to me, and we in Australia had all intentions of dividing the three weeks during which Shalom College is available into three parts. However, owing to difficulties with transport and owing to the fact that there may be great objections to Australian youngsters travelling each way for a full day just to spend four days in the seminar atmosphere, I telephoned Dr. Stern and, after submitting the problem to him, he agreed to reducing the number of seminars in the period to two longer ones. This may also be an advantage, as Australians may take longer to be emotionally involved and to work up enthusiasm.Taking into account various representations which I have received, I now wish to confirm to you that the first seminar will be exactly as you envisaged, except that the departure shall be moved to one day later. This will be balanced by the arrival of the next group one day later, giving you a full 48-hour break, which you requested. In addition, we have planned a full day's outing to the Blue Mountains and Jenolan Caves, a round trip of 150–200 miles. We had thought of this taking place at the end of the seminar, but Ruthie Casin suggested that it may be better to break the seminar activities towards the middle. Please give us your advice and guidance.As the second seminar starts a day later, it will have to continue to Sunday, 21st, when there is no morning train but an evening train. This seminar can also be broken by possibly two day outings. A visit to a performance of the Opera for this group will be out because of the Three Weeks. Howev…
Australia & New Zealand

Correspondence

Letter from Hans Bachrach to Abraham Stern about Counterpoint Australia Schedule (1974)

Dear Rabbi and Mrs. Bernan, My wife and I feel remiss not having personally replied to the letter which our friend, Dr. Abe Stern, delivered. However, you will be pleased to hear that, whilst our first inquiries proved negative, one source has been discovered which may yield results. Of course, we are delighted to hear that both of you may be leaving New York a few weeks ahead of the group, and if you could make it so as to arrive earlier than the rest in Australia, I would like to show our gratitude and from there assist you in making a more leisurely start.We suggest the following possible routes:(a) Tel Aviv / Singapore / Jakarta to Melbourne, or(b) Tel Aviv / Hong Kong / Jakarta to Melbourne, or(c) London / Tokyo / Taiwan / Hong Kong to Melbourne.On such a routing, you will be able to make one official stop for a few days, whilst the other stops are technical to make connecting flights. We shall try to see, if possible, that you have 12–24 hours at each place.My wife and I would be delighted to have you stay at our house, and we would be happy having you with us at the centre of Melbourne Jewish activities!Please convey our warmest regards. We look forward to seeing you soon.Yours sincerely,
Australia & New Zealand