Home Home / Letter from R. Carmy about Modern Ortho…

Correspondence

Apr. 12, 1988

Letter from R. Carmy about Modern Orthodoxy and Slackness (1988)

Orthodoxy & Other Denominations
View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

RELATED CONTENT

Correspondence

Letter to R. Soloveitchik about CCAR Journal Article on the Reform Attitude Toward Divorce (1964)

Dear Rabbi Soloveitchik: I just this morning was leafing through the most recent issue of CCAR Journal, and happened to notice an article by Jakob J. Petuchowski entitled, "Some Reflections on the Reform Attitude Towards Divorce." I am enclosing a photocopy of the last page of his article which I think may be of interest in the light of our conversation earlier this week about the possibility of coming to some understanding with Prof. Lieberman about the divorce problem.Respectfully yoursRabbi NORMAN LAMM
Orthodoxy & Other Denominations

Correspondence

Letter from R. Jakob Petuchowski about Centrist Orthodoxy (1988)

Dear Dr. Lamm: Although we have met personally only once, at one of the institutes arranged by David Hartman, I have long been an admirer of your writings in both Tradition and Moment. The favorable impression I have gained from your writings has now been greatly reinforced by reading the draft of your “Centrist Orthodoxy.” Thank you for sending it to me. First of all, let me tell you that I like the spirit of ahavat Yisrael in which that pamphlet is written. I like the call for moderation and the cooling of tempers. And I like your way of defining Centrist Orthodoxy per genus et differentiam. The spirit of your presentation reminded me somewhat of the atmosphere of Torah im derekh eretz, in which I had been brought up in Berlin. Could I engage in some nit-picking arguments with what you have to say? I suppose I could. Right as you are in saying that “Torah Judaism” is a redundancy, “for what is Judaism if not Torah?,” I feel somewhat uneasy about having any one group within Judaism lay a monopolistic claim to that name. Granted that Conservative Judaism, for example, is subject to the kind of criticism you level against it, I would argue that, even within Conservative ranks, there have been – and are – some believers in, and practitioners of, “Torah Judaism.” And hard as those believers and practitioners may be to find within the organizational structure of Reform Judaism, I would argue that, if you look hard enough, you might find one or two even there. The recently deceased Rabbi William G. Braude z”l of Providence, Rhode Island, could certainly be considered as such. But then, I understand that it is in the nature of any orthodoxy to make monopolistic claims; and as long as such claims have to be made, it is better to hear them expressed with your kind of derekh eretz than hurled in the strident voice of self-righteousness. It is certainly kind of you to inquire whether you reported my opinions correctly. On the whole, you did, although in my JRJ article I did …
Modern Orthodoxy Orthodoxy & Other Denominations

Correspondence

Letter to R. Weingarten about the Future of the Reform Movement (1997)

Dear Uzi: I just returned from my Israel-Prague trip and haven’t yet had time to unpack and go through my accumulated mail and calls, but I did want to respond to your somewhat anguished query about my interviews with Yom Hashishi and Makor Rishon. I did not see the printed results of the interviews, but – yes – I did and do feel that Reform has no future. I do not say this with any degree of satisfaction or triumphalism, certainly not with Schadenfreude. Indeed, it is tragic to even contemplate where Reform (and, for that matter, most of the American–Jewish community) is going. My prediction is based upon a cold (very cold!) analysis of the demographic data and the simple extrapolations, granted, of course, that no major societal or cultural convulsions will occur. Walk into any Reform Temple in this country and keep both your eyes and ears open and you will sense the tragic mass movement, lemming-like, into obscurity. Of course, if you’re willing to accept patrilinealism and easy “conversions” and “inclusivism” (which includes non-Jewish spouses officiating at various “rituals” in the “service”), then the future shines bright. But are you willing to make that assumption? Are you ready to have your humanism (in the best sense), your compassion, and Ahavat Yisrael so overwhelm your primary sense data and perception of objective facts that you are ready to concede that they are viable for the next few generations as a Jewish community? I am not ready to do that, because such transcendental ignorance does not contribute to healthy and effective communal planning. I repeat that we are facing a tragedy, and I am not in the business of assigning blame – there is enough to go around to all concerned. But this is what I foresee, what I fear, what I think must be said if we are to find or create some harbor for the gathering storm. For me to do otherwise is to submit to cultural correctness, which is every bit as dangerous as political correctness. So, Uzi, that’s where I…
Orthodoxy & Other Denominations