Letter from Milton Konvitz about R. Lamm's Citation in the Supreme Court's Miranda Decision (1967)

View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

Letter to Dr. Konvitz about Article on Privacy and the Law (1967)

Dear Professor Konvitz: Please forgive me my undue delay in reacting to the splendid article, a reprint of which you sent me, on "Privacy and the Law: A Philosophical Prelude." I preferred to do justice to so eminent an author by reading his work, with the requisite diligence and attention, instead of a perfunctory and cursory reading together with a superficial note of thanks. Your ideas are certainly enlightening, and constitute a most valuable contribution to the current literature on the theme of privacy. I quite agree with your association of sexual immorality with the exposure of one’s physical privacy in the Bible, as evidenced by the cases of Adam and Noah. I would add that the general Biblical term for Illicit sex is giluy arayot – which implies exposure, revealing, uncovering, and therefore the reverse of privacy and modesty.I hope you will forgive me for registering one objection to this section of your article. I would not have referred to the story of Adam and Eve as a "mythical" teaching. Even if one does not accept the narrative of Adam and Eve as being literal and historical truth, it is still a considerable jump from mythology to figurative truth in the Bible.Your connection of Justice Douglas’s opinion on "Zones of Privacy" as flowing out of Justice Brennan's notion of "breathing space," calls to mind the great and fundamental Talmudic principle of seyag le’torah; if, therefore, indeed, privacy is a Biblical notion, then Jews must consider it not as a point but as an area or "zone," and therefore Rabbinical legislation must include the "penumbra" in the areas prohibited to intrusion.It might interest you to know that I have been invited by Senator Edward Long to testify before his Senate sub-Committee on the view of Jewish law and theology on the question of privacy.It was a pleasure corresponding with you – I still hope to hear from you and receive any comments you may have on my article – and I look forward to meeting you personally at the May 7…

Jewish Law & Secular Law

Letter to Lawrence Kobrin about Article on the Fourth Amendment and Halacha (1967)

Dear Larry: Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments on my recent article on the Fourth Amendment. The avenue of investigation which you suggest is interesting. Off-hand, however, I am not aware of any communication that is regarded by the Halakhah as "automatically privileged." The very fact that, as I mentioned in my article, every communication is considered sacrosanct, would seem to make superfluous any special category of "privileged information." Nevertheless, I am putting your letter aside and hope to think about it a bit more systematically, when I return to the city, please God. Meanwhile, Mindy joins me in sending best regards to Ruth and in expressing our delight that the two of you, after your long search are finally becoming our close neighbours.Cordially yours,RABBI NORMAN LAMM

Jewish Law & Secular Law

Letter from Justice Silberg about Article on the Fourth Amendment and Halacha (1967)

אדוני הרב הנכבד, חן חן לך מקרב לב על מאמרך על התיקון הרביעי וההלכה. גישתך אל הנושא היא מקורית ודבריך מעניינים. יישר כוחך! בכבוד רב, פרופ' מ. זילברג.

Jewish Law & Secular Law