Home Home / Exchange with R. Abraham Gross about Ra…

Correspondence

April 1972

Exchange with R. Abraham Gross about Rabbinical Alliance Statement on Women's Rights Amendment (1972)

Women & Judaism

1. R. Abraham Gross to R. Lamm

1. R. Abraham Gross to R. Lamm (Apr. 14, 1972)

1. R. Abraham Gross to R. Lamm (April 14, 1972)

View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

Next Letter

RELATED CONTENT

Correspondence

Exchange with Judge Alvin Hellerstein about Counting Women in a Minyan (1973)

Dear Rabbi Lamm, It is after Yom Kippur, and I thought that I should set down for you some of my misgivings about your recent sermon on Jewish women. These came into better focus following some reading today, in the El Am discussion of Berakhoth 20b. If I remember correctly, your position was: (a) Jewish women are not required to perform mitzvot conditioned by time, (b) a minyan cannot depend on an onan for he is not required to say the Shema (or the prayers requiring the presence of a minyan), (c) a minyan cannot depend on the presence of one not commanded to say the Shema, (d) hence women cannot be counted towards a minyan.
Women & Judaism

Correspondence

Exchange with Mike Gruss about Rabbinic Authority and Women's Liberation (1974)

Dear Rabbi Lamm: During our brief discussion at the meeting of Think Tank, I argued that we should not formulate a uniform policy to deal with problems of Women's Liberation. Instead, I felt that Rabbis should anticipate and deal with these problems as they occur in their communities. I also felt that in the process of reaching a solution, each Rabbi should, within halachic bounds, take into consideration the nature and circumstances of the problem, the individuals involved and the impact which his solution might have on the immediate community and the community at large. I realize that my approach may result in different standards of observance from community to community but I believe that there are sufficient precedents for such different standards. For example, some religious schools are co-educational, some Synagogues allow women to participate in singing and receptions, etc. You argued that my suggestion was not practical because conditions in New York are such that Rabbis fearing other Rabbis are reluctant to suggest new programs designed to make the observance of tradition by women more meaningful. You also implied that you favored the creation of an "Advisory Body" which would either approve new decisions or suggest alternate solutions. This prompted me to suggest to Rabbi Rackman that we discuss whether or not present day circumstances require the creation of a supreme Rabbinical Authority. Frankly, I would argue against it. I believe that as in the past, local Rabbis and Beth Dins should be accorded sufficient authority to solve problems as they arise. I think that this system has worked well for many years and I would be strongly opposed to changing it. I feel that the institutionalization of religion in Israel with its inherent red tape and patronage has had a catastrophic effect on religion and the respect for it everywhere. I am aware of the annoyances to which you are subjected particularly when you receive so many phone calls, but I do believe that…
Women & Judaism

Correspondence

Exchange with R. Rackman Asking R. Lamm to Prepare Paper on Women and Halacha (1974)

Dear Norman: The next dinner meeting of our Berman–Bartel group will be held on September 4th. As agreed, it will be a longer meeting – from six to ten. The place is yet to be designated. From the discussion at the last meeting it appeared to me that there were four problem areas, as follows: 1. Halachic problems which pertain directly to the laws of marriage, divorce, and sexual relations. 2. Halachic problems which pertain to the status of women in the Synagogue, in the community and in civic, judicial, and political experience. 3. The sociological and psychological impact of the Women’s Liberation Movement. 4. What can be done to save the family in the face of those changes which cannot be resisted without total ghettoization as with the Amish. I would very much appreciate your undertaking to prepare the working paper for Problem #1. I am counting on you.
Women & Judaism