Home Home / Exchange with Dr. Handlin about "The Un…

Correspondence

June-July 1996

Exchange with Dr. Handlin about "The Unmarked Way" (1996)

Miscellaneous

1. R. Lamm to Dr. Handlin

1. R. Lamm to Dr. Handlin (June 24, 1996)

1. R. Lamm to Dr. Handlin (June 24, 1996)

View The Text

This content is currently available in its original PDF format. As we expand the library, we plan to add a text version as well.

Next Letter

RELATED CONTENT

Correspondence

Exchange with Dr. Heller about R. Lamm's Lecture on R. Kook (1963)

Dear Rabbi Lamm, A friend of mine who attended your lecture to Rabbi Koss’ group spoke glowingly about it. I was also shown the two or four–page leaflet containing some extracts from the writings of the “unsaintly sage” – where allegedly the views expressed by Maimonides matched those of any individual in U.S. so–called “progressive” exponents of Judaism. I should love to send your numerous brochures to about six individuals (laymen) who have been led to believe that all lofty and keen conceptions of God and the good life of the last century have come from Isaac M. Wise and his successors. With esteem and sincere feelings of friendship, I am Bernard Heller
Miscellaneous

Correspondence

Exchange with Dr. Noveck about Meeting to Discuss Hasidism Book and Adult Education Courses (1975)

Dear Norman, May I have the pleasure of coming to see you at your office any Tuesday or Thursday during the next couple of weeks for half an hour or so? There are three things I would like to discuss with you. First, the book on Hasidism on which you are working. Following up the material I prepared for Bernie Schafstein last summer, he has asked me to do a family comprehensive of creative adult education meeting around the country which will
Miscellaneous

Correspondence

Exchange with Edward Grusd about Manuscript Edits for "The Case Against Dialogues" (1967)

Dear Rabbi Lamm: I truly meant what I said to you on the telephone the other day concerning your article. You have presented your side of this controversial question so splendidly that I do not see how it could be improved upon by anyone else, and unlike the often prolix prose of Dr. Agus, yours is clear and easily understood by any intelligent person. I am therefore delighted to have the opportunity to present it to our readers, who have already had the other side of the dispute.I have just finished editing the manuscript. As I think I may have mentioned to you, it is very long and I wanted to cut it if possible. I pride myself on an ability to shorten manuscripts without injuring their theses, but I must confess that yours has almost completely baffled me, because wherever I insert the knife it seems that I touch a vital organ. I have managed to delete a sentence or two here and there without damage, but I have found it impossible to delete any long and substantial portions that would result in a worthwhile condensation.However, with your permission I would like to delete two relatively short passages which I think can be done without injury to the article. At the bottom of page 9 and for the first half of page 10, you give an example which is one of several you have given relating to the American Jewish Committee. They are all valid and excellent examples of what you are talking about, but it seems to me that this one is perhaps the weakest, relative to the others. I would therefore like to delete from the paragraph at the bottom of page 9 beginning "But more than vulgarity is in issue here" down to but not including the last paragraph on page 10.I would also like to delete the long paragraph beginning above the middle of page 11 and ending with the 2nd line of page 12. This passage makes an interesting point, but one which I do not think is absolutely vital to your thesis.I have just been notified that we must go to press earlier than we had anticipated, but du…
Miscellaneous